New Hampshire 2004
 

Election Analysis

 
 
Swing the Vote

2004 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION NEWS

The 2004 STV post-election analysis -- links to, and reprints of, essays and analysis of the election, discussion of Swing The Vote's activities, what we all did well and what went wrong nationally.

The articles and information available through links to other web sites do not necessarily represent Swing the Vote's views, position or platform.   Swing the Vote has verified neither the author, nor the facts presented.



ANALYSIS OF THE ELECTION - HOW BUSH WON

2004 Election Map

Maps and cartograms of the 2004 US presidential election results.

 

Poll Results Analysis by Borosage & Greenberg

Progressive commentator Robert Borosage of the Campaign for America's Future analyzes the 2004 presidential election results, including the hidden gains made by progressives in organization and state level election wins.   Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg follows Borosage to discuss polling results over the week and a half leading up to and through the election.   Based on these polls, Greenberg analyzes how Bush won and Kerry lost in the last days of the election campaign.

Click here for National Press Club transcript (pdf - November 5, 2004).

 

James Carville and Stanley Greenberg

SOLVING THE PARADOX OF 2004 - Why America Wanted Change but Voted for Continuity. Illustrates the lack of mandate for George Bush on nearly every signficant political issue, based on polling results from the electorate.

Click here for Solving the Paradox (pdf - November 9, 2004).

 

STRATEGY FOR PROGRESSIVES

Notes from Swing the Vote's planning session held December 5, 2004 (pdf) at the Franklin County Community Development Corporation’s offices in Greenfield, Mass.   The session was held to help determine Swing the Vote’s future work.  

These notes are almost entirely comprised of the participants’ own answers to the various strategy questions posed in the planning session’s agenda (pdf).

 

ELECTION FRAUD

Discussion of whether the election was 'stolen' - election fraud, electronic voting machine dangers, etc.

Download the STV paper on The Right to a Secure, Secret, Straight Vote (pdf)

Click here for the latest post election news.

 

CRITIQUE OF STV's OWN WORK

Download the sketch of Swing the Vote's genesis, work and impact (pdf)

Download the 2004 Presidential Election results compared with the 2000 vote in Cheshire County, NH (pdf)

Cheshire County Vote

Cheshire County went strongly for Kerry on Nov. 2nd, voting 24,429 for Kerry to only 16,463 for Bush, a margin of victory of 7,966 votes for Kerry in Cheshire County.  By contrast, in 2000 the Democratic margin for Gore in Cheshire County was only 3,589 votes (Gore getting 17,382 and Bush getting 13,793 that year).   These figures thus show a gross Democratic gain in Cheshire County of 7,047 votes when 2004 is compared to 2000 (24,429 in 2004 minus 17,382 in 2000).   They also show a net increase in the Democratic margin of victory in the county of 4,377 votes (7,966 in 2004 minus 3,589 in 2000).

The NH Secretary of State's updated election results showed that Kerry won New Hampshire by only 9,348 votes (340,126 for Kerry to 330,778 for Bush).   Paraphrasing Tim Butterworth's point on Sunday evening at the potluck: Kerry's 7,966 vote margin of victory in Cheshire County, with the statewide New Hampshire margin of victory being only 9,348, means that Cheshire County provided, in effect, 85% of Kerry's margin of victory in New Hampshire.   (In absolute terms, of course, other counties also contributed strongly to the Kerry victory, but we were all dragged back down by Republican wins in the southeastern NH counties.)

Nearly half (46.8%) of Kerry's statewide margin of victory was provided, in effect, by the increase in the Democratic margin of victory in Cheshire County generated by all the groups working there this year (4,377 vote increase in margin of victory in 2004 in Cheshire County divided by the 9,348 vote margin statewide = 46.8%).   In other words, nearly half of Kerry's NH win came, in effect, from the extra Democratic vote turnout generated by the organizations working in Cheshire County (and by Bush's own role mobilizing Democratic voter turnout!).

The pivotal role of Cheshire County in the Kerry victory was the product of many groups working there, including ACT, MoveOn, the Franklin County (MA) Democrats and, of course, the Cheshire County Democrats themselves, but I think that Swing the Vote's work also deserves some of the credit for this win.

Cheshire County had an amazing 6,358 people register to vote on election day this year, out of 41,718 voting.  Making the reasonable assumption that all who registered on election day voted, this means that 15% of the people voting in Cheshire County registered that day to vote.  This high voter registration was obviously the product of many groups' efforts (including the Republicans, I would guess, based on the high registration rate in Rindge and the strong vote for Bush there [1,626 for Bush to 1,500 for Kerry with 608 registrations on election day]), but, again, I am sure Swing the Vote played a positive contributing role.

Like we all realized by election night, we did a good thing, a really good thing in Cheshire County. This was a win for all of us, all of the progressive and anti-reactionary forces working side-by-side in the county, and we should learn and teach the lesson of what is possible when such a powerful united front focuses its unity on an electoral leverage point.

-- Rudy Perkins

 


Paid for by Swing The Vote and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. Donations will be used in connection with a Federal election and are not tax deductible.
Swing The Vote, PO Box 716, Rindge, NH 03461-0716
www.swingthevote.us
978-249-0923, or Toll free: 866-543-VOTE (8683)
swingthevote@yahoo.com